Susan R. Wolf (1952 – ) is a moral philosopher who has written extensively on significant in human life. She is currently the Edna J. Koury Professor of Philosophy at the University of Due north Carolina at Chapel Hill. She addresses the topic of the meaning of life, among other places, in her essay: "Happiness and Pregnant: Ii Aspects of the Practiced Life."

Wolf begins past asking: "In what does self-involvement consist?" Now the concept of self-interest is straightforward: "Self interest is involvement in one'south own skillful. To act self-interestedly is to act on the motive of advancing 1'south own skillful."  But the content of self-interest—what really is in our self-interest—is problematic.

To better understand the content of self-interest (SI) she follows Derek Parfit's distinction between three types of SI: 1) hedonistic theories which connect SI with happiness construed equally pleasance and lack of pain; 2) preference theories which hold that SI is any you want even those things don't make you happy or give pleasure; and iii) objective-list theories in which SI is independent or prior to one's preferences. Wolf argues that meaningfulness is an chemical element or ingredient of a good or happy life, and she is thus committed to meaning existence in one's SI in the objective-list sense for the goodness of a meaningful life "does non effect from making u.s. happy or its satisfying the preferences of the person whose life it is." Still. meaningful lives will generally be fulfilling and thereby brand us happy.

Next Wolf claims that our need for meaningful lives center on questions of whether life is worth living has any point, or provides sufficient reason to become on. Paradigms of meaningful lives include lives of moral or intellectual accomplishment, whereas meaningless lives include those lived in quiet desperation or in futile labor. In short, Wolf claims that: "… meaningful lives are lives of active engagement in projects of worth." [i]

Active engagement refers to beingness griped or excited past something. Agile engagement relates to being passionate rather than alienated virtually something, whereas being engaged is non always pleasant since it may involve hard piece of work. Projects of worth propose that some objective value exists, and Wolf argues that pregnant and objective value are linked. While Wolf offers a philosophical defense of objective value she claims that "in that location tin be no sense to the thought of meaningfulness without a stardom between more and less worthwhile ways to spend one'south fourth dimension, where the exam of worth is at least partly independent of a subject's ungrounded preferences or enjoyment." [ii]

To run across this point, outset consider that people'southward longings for significant are independent of whether they find their lives enjoyable. They may have a fun life but might come up to think information technology lacks meaning.  Second, why exercise nosotros seem to have an intuitive sense of meaningful and meaningless lives? Most of us would hold that certain kinds of lives are or are not meaningful.  Both of the higher up suggest that objective values are related to meaning.

This leads Wolf to reiterate that meaningful lives are ones actively engaged in worthwhile projects. If one is engaged in life, then information technology has a point; looking for meaning is looking for worthwhile projects. In addition, this view shows us why some projects are thought of as meaningful and others are not. Some projects are meaningful but wearisome (like writing checks to the ACLU), whereas others are pleasurable (like riding roller coasters) simply don't seem to give meaning to life. In this context, Wolf notes Bernard Williams' distinction betwixt categorical desires, whose objects are worthwhile independent of our desires; and all other desires, whose objects worthiness, presumably, depends on our desires. In brusque, she is proverb some values are objective.

To reiterate, meaningful lives link active appointment with objectively worthwhile projects. Lives lived without engagement lack pregnant, even if what they are doing is meaningful since the person living such a life is bored or alienated. Withal, lives lived with engagement are not necessarily meaningful, if the objects of the appointment are worthless since those objects lack objective value. Wolf summaries her view as follows: "Meaning arises when subjective allure meets objective attractiveness…significant arises when a subject discovers or develops an affinity for i or typically several of the more worthwhile things…" [three]

Summary – Meaningful lives consist of one'southward active engagement with considerately worthwhile things.

__________________________________________________________________

[i] Susan Wolf, "Meaning in Life" in The Pregnant of Life, ed. Eastward.D. Klemke and Cahn (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008), 232.
[two] Wolf, "Meaning in Life," 233.
[iii] Wolf, "Significant in Life" 234-35.

Liked it? Take a second to support Dr John Messerly on Patreon!